Golf Stream: LIV must harness tailwinds beyond linear TV deals 🏌️
As LIV Golf doubles down on its partnership with CW Network and seeks broadcast deals internationally, YouTubers could offer an interesting alternative opportunity to ‘fish where the fish are’
Not yet a subscriber? Join 1000+ sports business leaders, from the PFL to the Premier League, that read Sports Pundit every week to get impactful industry insights.
Earlier this month, despite securing its first U.S. linear TV deal, LIV Golf was derided for an apparent lack of interest among fans during its season opener at Mayakoba.
The accusation was leveled again over this past weekend as the series held its second event on the expanded 2023 calendar.
Per Nielsen, the series opener averaged just 286,000 viewers Saturday and 291,000 viewers on Sunday. While information is currently limited, early indications are the figures from this past weekend in Tucson, Arizona (JWS' college home) are even lower.
LIV has countered the notion that its product underperformed during its TV debut. Pointing to data from audience measurement provider iSpot, it claims the coverage generated a total audience of 3.2 million viewers on linear television across CW affiliates and Nexstar stations. A strong effort, particularly on a channel that hasn’t typically broadcast live sport.
Outside the US, viewing figures are harder to source. The tour struggled to find international broadcast partners and has since launched its own over-the-top (OTT) platform, LIV Golf+.
Whilst LIV has backed its partnership with CW and will hope to secure deals with international broadcasters sooner rather than later, Murray Barnett (founder, 26West Sport) suggests the upstart golf tour should also be considering more targeted ways to reach a differentiated audience.
“Fragmentation means the right strategy for a number of different rightsholders going forward is to be visible in a number of different broadcast environments," Barnett said. "The difficulty will be explaining to the various broadcast partners, whether they are YouTube or traditional TV channels, that they're not cannibalizing each other and that they're actually going after different audiences.”
Murray went on to speak anecdotally.
“My son is fifteen. He's never going to sit down and watch live sport on a TV channel because he doesn't watch anything on a TV channel anymore. However, if it was streamed on YouTube, with the right kind of personality, he may be interested to do that.”
This is a model that we have seen exercised cleverly elsewhere in sport.
Ahead of the FIFA World Cup in Qatar, FIFA reached a deal to partner with Casimiro. The deal allowed the Brazilian gaming streamer to show one match/day live to his followers (see: 3.4 million on Twitch, 5 million on YouTube).
According to Streams Charts, his broadcast of Brazil’s loss to Croatia was the most-watched YouTube live stream in 2022, it peaked with an audience of over six million people.
“By engaging with influencers and creators, our content offering alongside the streams has broken new barriers for FIFA," Jean-Christophe Petit (director of media partnerships, FIFA) said. "Now that we have seen how well this new playbook can work, we’re excited to see what is possible as we move forward.”
More recently, a similar model was implemented by RMC Sport, a French broadcaster with domestic rights to the UEFA Europa League. RMC shared its rights to the first leg of the FC Barcelona vs. Manchester United clash with popular Twitch streamer Domingo (1.6 million followers), who carried the match for free on his channel. The stream drew an average concurrent audience of 162,000, with a peak of over 200,000 viewers; a noteworthy total considering the linear French broadcast average only averaged 390,000 fans.
“The current concept of broadcast exclusivity has become a slightly archaic concept because different audiences are consuming sports on different platforms,” Barnett said.
He argues that in reality, “There's little cannibalization because it's actually just going to where the different audiences are, which are much more fractured than they were ten or twenty years ago.”
There is some precedent for domestic rights owners leveraging multiple platforms and presentations to cast a wider net (see: the NFL's Manningcast or NHL's Big City Greens broadcast).
“The idea of having multiple feeds, or multiple different ways in which you can view a match is ultimately the way to go if you're trying to appeal to the widest possible audience, because increasingly, the level of customization that people are looking for in the way that they view content is growing,” Barnett said.
This is where the difficulty –and opportunity– lies for LIV Golf as it works alongside a broadcast channel where golf fans wouldn’t usually find themselves.
“This is all about needing to fish where the fish are and knowing that different fish take different bait,” Barnett said.
Content partnerships with the golfers already on LIV's highly impressive roster, as well as with popular creators across the golf landscape (think: Good Good Golf, Paige Spirinac, Rick Shields), could provide interesting adjacencies to linear television and help the upstart tour reach new audiences on alternative platforms.
There are also services like ReCast, that encourage people with a following to re-share content (and gives them a cut of the revenue). By providing a different context, rightsholders like LIV could reach new audiences.
Not yet a subscriber? Join 1000+ sports business leaders, from the PFL to Premier League, that read Sports Pundit every week to get impactful industry insights.